Saturday, January 22, 2011

Open source website development vs. traditional website development

Difference between open source website development vs. traditional website development

In a recent proposal, E-creation was asked to explain what open source website development is in laymen's terms. Since a layman's explanation of open source website development is probably useful for other potential clients exploring the best avenue for their website development approaches, here is an extract:

On a simple level, open source vs. traditional website development is similar to the difference between Wikipedia vs. Encyclopedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica is a commercial resource written by experts, with staff & organizational costs and as a resulting, substantial cost attached to the purchase of the content. Wikipedia is a content platform, open to anyone, where information is entered / validated by the public - and offered to the public for free. Quality of the information is 'policed' by the public (effectively using 'wisdom of the crowds') and research indicates that the quality of information is generally as good (see below*).

Open source code platforms allow the public to create & publish code, with quality control managed through developers rating each others code. There are thousands of open source objects or plugins available for functionality such as newsletters, Twitter feeds & shopping carts, which helps to reduce project development costs & timescales. For clients looking to develop websites, choosing between open source & traditional development, is not a question of quality of code, but rather a philosophy. Dot.net is an example of a classic development platform (with associated license costs & 'from scratch' development costs).

During website development projects, the use of OpenSource technology (such as WordPress) provides significant time / cost benefits, as many free plug-ins are available to deliver key functionality for your website requirements. The costs involved are research, installation & customization time, rather than specification, coding & testing.

As open source plug-ins are already commercially in use in other sites, their functionality is tried & tested (reducing bug fixing time at the end of the project). The challenge faced by developers coming from non-open source background is the time involved in project management / training, which can add to development costs.

* "For its study, Nature chose articles from both sites in a wide range of topics and sent them to what it called "relevant" field experts for peer review. The experts then compared the competing articles--one from each site on a given topic--side by side, but were not told which article came from which site. Nature got back 42 usable reviews from its field of experts.

In the end, the journal found just eight serious errors, such as general misunderstandings of vital concepts, in the articles. Of those, four came from each site. They did, however, discover a series of factual errors, omissions or misleading statements. All told, Wikipedia had 162 such problems, while Britannica had 123.

That averages out to 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica and 3.86 for Wikipedia."


http://news.cnet.com/Study-Wikipedia-as-accurate-as-Britannica/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

Monday, January 17, 2011

F-commerce - Facebook & Amazon WebStore Technology Explained

F-commerce (Facebook Commerce) is a hot topic for E-creation's online retail customers - with many client's asking about the effects of F-commerce on the e-commerce market. Given that most of our e-commerce website development is done on a bespoke basis (either customising off-the-shelf packages like Magento, WP e-commerce or our our platform), we are rarely asked to look at  'online packages', since they lack the flexibility of custom e-commerce website developments. 

So what is F-commerce? Facebook Commerce, put simply, is an Amazon WebStore embedded into Facebook page. F-commerce is receiving lots of interest due to its low entry costs & development speed, making it possible to create a fully functioning e-commerce store, in a matter of days.

Amazon Webstores are built using an online tool, provided by Amazon, enabling businesses to create e-commerce front-ends using a simple, web-based administration system. Products loaded into the webstore (either manually product by product, by CSV or XML) can then be purchased via a webstore front-end (with your unique URL), via Amazon product search OR through F-commerce pages within Facebook.

From a functionality point of view, Amazon Webstores & F-commerce offer no new innovations in the way that the e-commerce website works - it's principle is to use social networking to help drive additional traffic by showing your friends your purchases. They see what you buy (either via your Facebook page or via the F-commerce store) and are influenced - but this is not different to the current 'Like' functionality that has become standard practice in e-commerce webstore.

Put simply, F-commerce is a different location for your webstore (in the same way that you might move your retail premises to a new location) with 'broadcasts' of your purchases within Facebook.

So lets go back to the basics of e-commerce retailing and the influence of F-commerce ...

What are the most important success factors for contemporary e-commerce retailing?

SEO and website structure still remain the most important factors. The technology platform (Magento, WordPress WP e-commerce, F-commerce or custom e-commerce code bases) will define where you start your relationship with a customer.

Do customers find you through search engines or affiliate marketing, through Google Shopping or other price comparison websites, or through more traditional marketing methods. With so many e-commerce websites available now, choice becomes a a challenge, hence the power of price comparison websites to help make price / service comparison easier.

Most of the rules that apply to traditional retailing apply to e-commerce retailing. Once a customer relationship has been established, it's much easier to sell to existing customers - hence the very effective use of e-mail marketing by Amazon - that's where the real 'profit' exists for many e-commerce websites. Using the Amazon webstore platform can create additional opportunities because of 'side street' traffic, where Amazon's e-mail marketing creates product interest and visitors to the site.

What three technical features are essential for good e-commerce practice?

E-commerce systems are continually evolving but there are several key 'technical' features that help to make an e-commerce website into a successful retail 'engine':

  • Google Merchant - giving your products SEO placement advantage in search engines, so that they are found ahead of your competitors because first found is most likely to be first purchased
  • Simple social media integration - simple social media features features such as Facebook 'Like', Twitterfeeds & product recommendations are simple to implement but deliver big commercial results
  • Behaviour tracking - if knowledge is power then knowing what your customer is doing is profit. Tracking the user from their point of entry (search engines, keywords, e-mail marketing, etc) through to click tracking via heat maps build essential information to tune the user experience

What is the likely influence of F-commerce?

Facebook has lots of users, so it's a good captured market, when being used within Facebook. However, most of the 'noise' on the web currently about F-commerce appears to be driven by social media proponents (people like Facebook, social media marketing agencies & the media) - so are Facebook users your target customers?

There is a difference between 'impulse purchase' customers (for whom F-commerce may be suitable after they see an advert for a product in Facebook) and more deliberate shoppers, who typically type in a product name a search engine (or go directly to their favourite online retailer, such as Amazon) where they can compare online retailers easily). Since F-commerce or Facebook shops are just a 'front' for Amazon shops, so it is unclear were the additional value from a commercial perspective is achieved.

Given the fact that Internet consumers generally tend to be more price motivated than high street shoppers, product inclusion in price comparison systems like Google Shopping is essential. F-commerce shops can run in parallel with these price comparison systems, ensuring higher visibility to potential customers.

What do you think to the F-commerce phenomenon?

Not sure we'd call it a phenomenon. F-commerce is an opportunity for Facebook to make more money and agencies are jumping on the bandwagon to make some money as well! F-commerce compromises the user experience and brand values (since it includes the Facebook branding at the top & imposes to a degree a design style). It might represent a cheap, easy way for non-professional retailers to quickly create an e-commerce store, borrowing on the Facebook credibility but consumers will rapidly see through this.

F-commerce needs to innovate more heavily, integrating the Facebook advertising & marketing engine deeply to create a smarter 'path' to customer (e.g. use the Facebook demographic information, previous purchase behaviour & dynamic product variation). Once F-commerce makes the creation of new e-commerce customers more efficient, then it is possible to create a better way to sell. But the current 'engine' is clunky, ugly and unintelligent ...

What is the future of online retailing?

Online retailing will undoubtedly continue to expand but the influence of mobile applications will be more influential than F-commerce due to the simplicity & general availability (around the world, mobile phone access exceeds Internet access massively). The Amazon & Ebay applications for the Apple iPhone have already changed the way people shop and are taking rapid chunks of businesses out of traditional e-commerce applications & traditional retail.

If I am out shopping, see something I like, I can scan the barcode using the camera and either eBay or Amazon iPhone Apps will find the item online at the cheapest price within seconds. If there is a significant price difference, I can order & pay in 15 seconds via my mobile phone - that's faster than going to the checkout to pay! This is a massive threat to traditional retailers who have rely on the quality of their service (the shopping experience) and the customer's unwillingness to use their feet to shop further - effectively reaching a suitable price / time-spend compromise.

What is the future for retails stores?

The future depends on the products. There is always innovation in retail because shopping is an experience that people are willing to pay for.

  • Some goods sell better in shops because of the shopping experience (chit-chat with friends, attractive sales people, the coffee 'out' & ability to touch products that feel nice)
  • Some goods are more price sensitive (and therefore people are more likely to go online and use e-commerce to make savings)
  • Some goods are simply not suitable for online retailing (e.g. wedding dresses [though even in this market, people may window shop and then purchase online]).
The question really that really needs to be addressed is 'what is a modern retail shop?' With people like John Lewis fusing their online and physical retail operations (e.g. order online and get it delivered to your local shop the next day for free), the line between shopping physically & online is blurring. With iPhone apps, it's now even more complex, where the shopper combines the physical experience of shopping, with access to the Internet for price comparison via their mobile phone.

Will retails stores be phased out completely? No ... it will never happen because there are too many goods that people need to see and buy on the basis of product context as much as the product itself. Other consumers need their product 'now'. E-commerce makes more choice available and the more choice we have, the more difficult it becomes to select and be satisfied with a purchase (as described so well in 'The Paradox of Choice') - therefore the experience comes to hold more importance (whether that be the online experience or the in-store experience).

Ultimately, with so much choice, consumers need the friendly confirmation of 'a fine choice, sir' to validate their purchase decision, whether it comes from a sales person, a friend or an online recommendation of a product.